I need the world to be clear on what it means when one says another “can’t read” at the United States. (Because I’m unsure if – in other parts of the world, people are shunned or looked down upon like they are at the U.S. if they “can’t read”).

Just because someone cannot read English does not mean they cannot read at all. But at the U.S., folks love to shame the people and create class systems by saying one who cannot read English “can’t read” or is “illiterate”.

One may not be able to read the nation’s designated language, and if one is not originally an Englishman, but has been forcefully conditioned to read a particular language apart from their genetically original tongue by English powers, then how does one assume another cannot read altogether?

Have you tried teaching/communicating in another language to see if they have an easier time reading that before you mark one “illiterate”?

English is a bastardized Proto-Indo-European language that changes all the time. Before consonants and vowels, there is simply sound. How do we know the one who “can’t read” or is “illiterate” does not know a variation of another tongue that WE may not comprehend? Or perhaps a genetic predisposition toward a language that has not been presented to them for THEM to even realize that they lean toward one language or another?

These are very important things to consider before we label folks illiterate or put them down for “not being able to read”. Now, if they have no reading comprehension of ANY language and/or no ability to learn it, then this is what it means for someone not being able to read for whatever reason.

Yes, it is important to be able to communicate the colonial language or the one of the local populations to get around, but we have to do better making assumptions folks, when it comes to that.

I get tired of being surrounded by so many inflated egos and self-entitled folks who don’t deserve to be. Or people who feel like you are required to go with their agenda bc that’s the timing THEY are on. I am not you, and you are definitely not me.

Gets old.

People will sit around with all the time in the world, while u bust ur ass and then ask you why you don’t have the energy to move w them.

From now on, I go with the flow. I’m not afraid or concerned either way it goes.

UPDATE: 04.04.24

The writing is on the wall. The “rumors” been flying around for WAY too long. The evidence has yet to be revealed, but this dude and some of his friends are more likely than NOT- guilty of crimes against humanity. At the very least, he owes SEVERAL apologies and reparations to those he has offended.

(Original Post: 11.26.23)

Oooh-kay.

Emotions aside on this Diddy case, like every other case in the world,

We must always see about the evidence first, would not one say?

Because…and I speak this generally; regardless of hearsay, the party bringing suit now has the burden of proving their allegations.

I bring this up on this case specifically because it is a topic that – although I find important to address IF in fact allegations can be proven, we must all be mindful of the history of media and how often a picture is painted that one is guilty until proven innocent. Because at times, emotional realities may clash with logical realities.

Okay so what I’m comprehending is…

Palestine is upset with the state of Isreal that has been establish there [Ashkanazi Jews (German Jews), I’m assuming?] although modern Palestinians are mixed nationalities as well too, right?

Clarification: The state of Isreal establishing itself at/in Palestine, is recent from what I’ve gathered, correct? Also, when I refer to the mixed nationalities of both Palestinians and Jews, are not the modern nationalities also a melting pot of cultural experiences? Where two people from different worlds cross paths and fall in love or become friends, whose families become families?

However both sides feel disrespected, it seems. If they can come to a cease fire, they can take time to possibly hash out the disagreement and discuss the terms based on each eras experience.

Because the history is long, and the ties seem to be deep, and so there are roots that cross in various areas, sometimes unharmoniously

Some media states that Isreal is treating the Palestinians extremely harsh. But I also heard that the U.S. is supplying Arms to them. However, there must be a treaty or something. If not, then some sort of contract.

Other media sources state that the Palestinians are acting a particular way about themselves, but moreso in defense.

As for Home in the Ameru-khas , it’s a journey.

Clarification: when I begin by saying “what I’m comprehending,” I mean it as a question. This post is a question.

I wonder if… the super prejudiced stereotype that Asiatics “cannot swim” (please know that I do not support this stereotype, but have heard it several times over the course of my life) may actually be a clue to the possibility that- if it were in fact so, that it would be due to evolving far enough from the hybrid development of fish-to-land animals? But then… how would Asiatics survive in the womb if this held any truth? For in the womb we have webbed hands, feet, and gills before fingers, toes, and lungs…😧 And after all, there ARE expert Asiatic swimmers in the world, just like there are in other people groups.

However, I wonder if it keeps closer to the notion that Asiatics are closest to the upright Man and further from reptilians (as an example) or other hybrids as being closest to the homo erectus / sapien sapien should there be some correlation between the subjects of My question?…🤔

What sparked the question is watching how fish have evolved from fins and gills in water to land animals with legs, toes and lungs eventually evolving into Amphibians. It is said there are Human hybrids with these various bloodlines that exist today called Reptilians.

But then if it is so, then is this where the stereotype may actually prove that the original Man was never a sea animal?

It still brings me back to my question of how we all survive in the waters of the womb then, though; Asiatic Man, Hybrid Human, or any of the other race/s of specie.

I think the proper question is;

Whether the fight in Palestine is AT Isreal or IN Isreal?

Because then One would need to know if the STATE of Isreal is fighting with Palestine, what the ENTIRE history is (not just the news clippings), and if this war is between aboriginal Hebrews or Preservers of the faith such as the Ashkenazi Jews (whom i wonder if at times may be hybrid Hebrews in certain bloodlines). If it is between two Germanic business powers of the same root, then these are not the original locations of the heritage and have other stipulating circumstances that we must pay attention to in order to formulate our decisions on who is entitled to what and why.

However, i still do not believe that it is right to harm others who harm you if you know your Self in the one Universal creator, because it still hurts the one causing the pain in that space, to hurt another.

Still, our lower Selves may get the best of us.

All of this to say, that it is not wise for folks to jump in the middle of a war based upon emotions. Do the homework, ask those from both sides who are affected, and try to approach every circumstance in love, truth, peace, freedom and Justice. I see #CancelCultureVoltures intruding upon peoples lives and ruining opportunities for one another whose survival depends on it, simply to make individuals with their own opinions conform. That is not a practice of tolerance. And if it be an eye for an eye, in a situation as touching as this, please please please be SURE u have all the facts to stand upon before you interact.

Was, on this day, like a light in the darkness, continued to shine on 🕯…

Congratulations Mr. Anthony Hamilton on your retirement from the music industry business. Thank you for everything you gave, especially the soul and the class.

Many well wishes to you and yours!

Never mistake arrogance for confidence. You will be sadly mistaken when you’re caught in a cycle of dealing with arrogant assholes who don’t actually care about how you view things or feel about things when you thought you were attracted to their confidence.